Fundamentals · CSX
Valuation Summary for CSX
AI-generated plain-English read of valuation summary for CSX. Updated daily.
Rich multiples, expanding
moderateRich multiples (25.1x) with expanding trajectory — multiples pricing in growth acceleration; any miss compresses sharply.
What will probably happen
- Expanding multiples on an already-expensive stock implies the market expects earnings acceleration — any miss triggers sharp compression.
- Modest income yield provides a partial floor while waiting for valuation normalisation.
What to do
- If you HOLD this stock
- You're long expensive multiples that are still expanding — implies the market is pricing in continued growth acceleration. Any disappointment compresses sharply. Hold but trim if the next 2 quarters miss.
- If you're EVALUATING this stock
- Pass unless your conviction on growth durability is high. Expanding multiples already price in the bull case — you're paying for a scenario that hasn't happened yet.
- If you trade OPTIONS
- Sell premium against shares (covered calls); IV likely elevated. Avoid long calls — multiple compression risk dominates if growth disappoints. Bear call spreads hedge the downside.
9 quarters / 3 populated multiples — directionally informative; use more data for full conviction.
Technical details
Technical analysis
- P/Book
- 5.6x
- P/Sales
- 5.4x
- EV/EBITDA
- —
- FCF yield
- —
- EV/Revenue
- —
- P/E (forward)
- —
- Dividend yield
- 1.3%
- Earnings yield
- —
- Income profile
- Balanced Income
- P/E (trailing)
- 25.1x
- Sector context
- Road & Rail
- Sector comparison
- Unknown Vs Sector
- Absolute valuation
- Richly Valued
- History (quarters)
- 9
- Multiple trajectory
- Expanding
Key levels
| Level | Value |
|---|---|
| pb ratio | 5.628 |
| pe ratio | 25.061 |
| ps ratio | 5.401 |
| n quarters | 9 |
| prior year pe | 17.207 |
| dividend yield | 0.013 |
Caveats
- Multiples should be read alongside growth and quality metrics — a low P/E on declining earnings isn't cheap, it's a value trap warning.
- Sector context wasn't provided — absolute multiples may mislead without industry comparison.