Chart & Technical · GS
Peer Outliers for GS
AI-generated plain-English read of peer outliers for GS. Updated daily.
GS: focused peer outlier on debt-to-equity
highGS diverges from its peer median specifically on debt-to-equity in the Financial Services sector. The direction of the divergence is ambiguous from the available data.
What will probably happen
- The divergence on debt-to-equity is notable but directionally ambiguous: context from the business narrative is required.
What to do
- If you HOLD this stock
- The peer outlier picture is inconclusive. Hold pending a clearer signal from other dimensions.
- If you're EVALUATING this stock
- Ambiguous peer outlier profile. Read other signals before initiating.
- If you trade OPTIONS
- Peer comparison alone doesn't point strongly in one direction. Let other signals (momentum, sentiment) determine directional bias.
10 peers and 6 metrics evaluated: robust outlier detection.
Technical details
Technical analysis
- Outlier breadth
- Focused Outlier
- Outlier direction
- Neutral
- Divergence strength
- Moderate Divergence
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Peer count
- 10
- Metrics evaluated
- 6
- P/E ratio z-score
- -0.24σ (in line)
- P/S ratio z-score
- +0.10σ (in line)
- P/B ratio z-score
- -0.20σ (in line)
- operating margin z-score
- +0.22σ (in line)
- return on equity z-score
- -0.58σ (in line)
- debt-to-equity z-score
- +1.54σ (outlier)
Key levels
| Level | Value |
|---|---|
| n peers | 10 |
| n metrics | 6 |
| z pe | -0.238 |
| target pe | 14.421 |
| peer median pe | 15.197 |
| z ps | 0.101 |
| target ps | 4.311 |
| peer median ps | 3.946 |
| z pb | -0.198 |
| target pb | 2.122 |
| peer median pb | 2.405 |
| peer median gross margin | 0.846 |
| z operating margin | 0.218 |
| target operating margin | 0.375 |
| peer median operating margin | 0.329 |
| z roe | -0.585 |
| target roe | 0.146 |
| peer median roe | 0.182 |
| z debt to equity | 1.54 |
| target debt to equity | 3.541 |
| peer median debt to equity | 1.559 |
Caveats
- Outlier reads compare against peer median; if the peer set isn't truly comparable (e.g. growth-stage vs mature mix), the divergence is a definition artifact, not insight.