Economy & PolicyExtended setretiredNew

Consumer Sentiment Sector Rotation

Updated monthlyData needs: lowlong onlyshort onlylong short
RFS
2006
Review of Financial Studies
Lemmon, Portniaguina (2006) 'Consumer Confidence and Asset Prices: Some Empirical Evidence', RFS 19(4). Secondary: Akhtar, Faff, Oliver, Subrahmanyam (2012) J Banking & Finance. NOTE: the implemented signal was an intentional deviation from this paper (see mechanism) and the family was retired 2026-06-04.
Read the paper →

In plain terms

The cited research finds the opposite of a momentum story: when consumer sentiment is unusually high (after stripping out the economy's fundamentals), small-cap stocks tend to do WORSE afterward. Our earlier version traded raw sentiment in the same direction as the trend, which does not match the research, so it was retired in June 2026.

How it works

Paper finding (Lemmon-Portniaguina 2006): the component of consumer sentiment ORTHOGONAL to macro fundamentals CONTRARIAN-predicts the cross-section; high residual sentiment forecasts LOW subsequent small-cap / low-institutional-ownership returns, captured as a small-minus-big spread at roughly quarterly horizons. This family instead implemented a pro-cyclical, per-ticker overlay on RAW UMCSENT (12m rolling z; long when z > +1 with a 60d own-name uptrend, short when z < -1 with a 60d downtrend), which is the opposite direction of and structurally different from the paper's effect. A 2026-06-04 empirical check found the contrarian sign holds only for small-caps at 21-63d and inverts at 126d and for large-caps, so no per-ticker sign flip is faithful; the family was retired (removed from the active generator registry, no-op in production). A faithful version would be a separate cross-sectional regime family on the orthogonalized sentiment residual (long small-minus-big when sentiment is low, ~quarterly hold) scored in the factor/pool lane.

Live results

0 times picked on its own · 32 times inside a blend (24 beat the stock) · updated 2026-06-06
This strategy is a frequent ingredient in blends that combine a few strategies on one stock. It has contributed to 32 such blended picks (24 of which beat simply holding the stock). Picking it on its own is only one of the ways it shows up.
How its picks scored vs. buy & hold
Each pick is graded on a recent year it was never tuned on, against simply owning the same stock
Where its edge concentrates
Share of picks in each company-size group that beat buy & hold
How often it trades
Active vs. patient. Bars on the left mean it waits for rare setups; bars on the right mean it trades often
Return vs. buy & hold
How much each pick beat or trailed simply owning the stock over the test year (extreme microcap moves trimmed)
Loading substrate evidence…

Data dependencies

  • Daily prices

    Adjusted-close OHLCV for every US-listed ticker; primary price feed.

  • Fred macro

    A data feed this strategy reads, refreshed on its normal schedule.

Expected edge

Reported return
~1-1.5% quarterly on the contrarian small-minus-big leg (orthogonalized sentiment residual); direction is opposite to the implemented overlay
Tested over
1956-2002 (Lemmon-Portniaguina)

Paper's 1-1.5% quarterly alpha applies to the CONTRARIAN small-minus-big leg on orthogonalized sentiment (Lemmon-Portniaguina 2006), not to the pro-cyclical per-ticker overlay this family implemented; no paper-backed edge estimate exists for the implemented rule.

Related families

Explore Consumer Sentiment Sector Rotation on alphactor.ai

See which tickers this family is currently firing on, with live signals and rankings.

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Learn more