Equal-Weight Consensus
In plain terms
Instead of trying to optimize weights across sub-signals (which overfits), just equal-weight K canonical price signals. Hard to beat out-of-sample.
How it works
DeMiguel-Garlappi-Uppal (2009, RFS) "Optimal vs Naive Diversification" shows 1/N portfolio weighting is shockingly hard to beat out-of-sample once you account for estimation error in fancy optimization. We apply this at the alpha-family level: several canonical sub-signals (SMA50/200 cross, RSI(14) mean-reversion, 20d-high breakout, 1m-vs-12m TSMOM-lite, 5d return reversion), each returns {-1, 0, +1}, the meta position is the mean clipped to [-1, +1] — buy when ≥3/5 agree long, short when ≥3/5 agree short.
Live results
23 times picked on its own · 52 times inside a blend (47 beat the stock) · updated 2026-06-06Data dependencies
- Daily prices
Adjusted-close OHLCV for every US-listed ticker; primary price feed.
Expected edge
See the source research for the original effect size; a modern replication on new data may be weaker.
Explore Equal-Weight Consensus on alphactor.ai
See which tickers this family is currently firing on, with live signals and rankings.