Filings, Insiders & OwnershipExtended setexperimental liveNew

Transcript Revision Disagreement Magnitude

Updated dailyData needs: highlong short
paper
2012
Source
Larcker-Zakolyukina 2012 JAR -- Detecting Deceptive Discussions in Conference Calls.
Read the paper β†’

In plain terms

The larger the gap between management optimism on a call and subsequent analyst estimate cuts, the stronger the drift toward analyst reality.

How it works

Large disagreement between management tone (FinBERT on the call transcript) and the magnitude of analyst estimate revisions in the following 30 days signals a credibility gap. The bigger the disagreement, the stronger the subsequent price reversal toward analyst consensus.

No live results for this strategy yet. Charts appear once it has earned a top spot on at least one stock, either on its own or as part of a blend of several strategies.
Loading substrate evidence…

Data dependencies

  • Daily prices

    Adjusted-close OHLCV for every US-listed ticker; primary price feed.

  • Finbert scores

    A data feed this strategy reads, refreshed on its normal schedule.

  • Earnings transcripts

    Full earnings-call transcripts (prepared + Q&A), tokenised.

Expected edge

Tested over
2003-2010 (Larcker-Zakolyukina)

Magnitude of tone-revision disagreement predicts 2-5% 60-day return in the cross-section.

Related families

Explore Transcript Revision Disagreement Magnitude on alphactor.ai

See which tickers this family is currently firing on, with live signals and rankings.

For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Learn more